Saturday, 23 February 2008
  0 Replies
  6.1K Visits
0
Votes
Undo
  Subscribe
We've got a nice run of Z's going at the moment. Another one to start soon. Some of you may recognize these bodies already.
13 years ago
·
#11081
0
Votes
Undo
Here are clear pics
13 years ago
·
#11073
0
Votes
Undo
[quote="John H.":qyoevvvx]Just for curiosity and completeness, here's what would be neat to see: 1) an FD loaded Z3 [b:qyoevvvx](basically a Z2 with the front pickup added where in would be on a Z1)[/b:qyoevvvx] and 2) a Z3 with two FDs at the bridge position w/ a Fatty in the neck position.[/quote:qyoevvvx] As the pickup titles still kind of confuse me, could you walk me through this? #1 means like this? These back pickups... [img:qyoevvvx]http://www.dingwallguitars.com/images/img_z2.jpg[/img:qyoevvvx] ... combined with the front pickup from this one? [img:qyoevvvx]http://www.dingwallguitars.com/images/img_z1.jpg[/img:qyoevvvx] Are those FDs on both basses?
13 years ago
·
#11072
0
Votes
Undo
[quote="John H.":wi8gsnkp]Hi Jj. I don't remember requesting the current rendition, although it's great to see all these possible combos.[/quote:wi8gsnkp] Sorry John, my mistake
13 years ago
·
#11070
0
Votes
Undo
When doing the MachII Z3 Jango can you do a version 22 fret version with all 3 pu's touching each other?
13 years ago
·
#11068
0
Votes
Undo
Hi Jj. I don't remember requesting the current rendition, although it's great to see all these possible combos. Before you came along with all your wonderful Photoshop work, I had used drawings that Sheldon had posted to lay out an Z-FD-3. It didn't bother me that there was so much pickup on the bass, but that particular bass hasn't been rendered, yet. Just for curiosity and completeness, here's what would be neat to see: 1) an FD loaded Z3 (basically a Z2 with the front pickup added where in would be on a Z1) and 2) a Z3 with two FDs at the bridge position w/ a Fatty in the neck position. I can't imagine there would be many other pickup combos worth gawking at than those.
13 years ago
·
#11067
0
Votes
Undo
After testing it out (via illustration), I agree with Sheldon
13 years ago
·
#11058
0
Votes
Undo
Hey Sheldon, thought you might like this comment from my Z thread at TB... [i:17r59h3f]"That last pic! That contour! That shape! Oh my! That's the best shape Sheldon has ever done! Voodoo shape with sculpted curve. Fantastic."[/i:17r59h3f] Of course, I agree!
13 years ago
·
#11056
0
Votes
Undo
"][quote="guitarded":20pyp7pm] Sheldon initially tried to make FDs fit on the Z3, but it was too crowded. I thought I wanted them anyway, and he was going to do it, but I decided on Fatties instead :) . I love 'em. I guess you could use FDs, but don't get a 24 fret neck with them if you slap much- you wouldn't have room. Mark[/quote:20pyp7pm] [quote="John H":20pyp7pm]...maybe it's the position of the neck pup that is the problem you're referring to). John[/quote:20pyp7pm] Exactly. The FD is nearly twice as wide as the Fattie and crowds the neck. I wonder if you could get a Fattie at the neck and FDs at the back? Mark
13 years ago
·
#11055
0
Votes
Undo
[quote="guitarded":1s245y3w][quote="Dragonlord":1s245y3w]Calling Jjango! Could we please get a Z3 with FD-3s instead of super fatties? So that we can see how much space would three FD-3s leave. Thanks![/quote:1s245y3w] Sheldon initially tried to make FDs fit on the Z3, but it was too crowded. I thought I wanted them anyway, and he was going to do it, but I decided on Fatties instead :) . I love 'em. I guess you could use FDs, but don't get a 24 fret neck with them if you slap much- you wouldn't have room. Mark[/quote:1s245y3w] Yep, I know that, actually I talked with Dingwall Sales a bit about the possibility of ordering a walnut-bodied Z-FD-3 but that took us into prima artist territory, which means $10k+ and I would really struggle to afford it. Imagining it myself, I also think that it would be really crowded with FD-3s (one more reason why I didn't order the bass), but since we have Jjango around I thought it would be nice to have a picture and see exactly what it would look like.
13 years ago
·
#11053
0
Votes
Undo
[quote="guitarded":2y0x62pf] Sheldon initially tried to make FDs fit on the Z3, but it was too crowded. I thought I wanted them anyway, and he was going to do it, but I decided on Fatties instead :) . I love 'em. I guess you could use FDs, but don't get a 24 fret neck with them if you slap much- you wouldn't have room. Mark[/quote:2y0x62pf] Yeah, I thought I'd go with the FD-3s, too, but I tried Twoport's Z3 right after NAMM and liked the Fattys. Plus, this way, I'll have two DWs, each with a slightly different sound. Mark, I'm not sure how having FD-3s would affect slapping. I always presumed a Z-FD-3, if you will, would be a Z2 with the addition of the neck pickup in the same position as the Z1 (but maybe it's the position of the neck pup that is the problem you're referring to). John
13 years ago
·
#11045
0
Votes
Undo
[quote="Dragonlord":2z07l52l]Calling Jjango! Could we please get a Z3 with FD-3s instead of super fatties? So that we can see how much space would three FD-3s leave. Thanks![/quote:2z07l52l] Sheldon initially tried to make FDs fit on the Z3, but it was too crowded. I thought I wanted them anyway, and he was going to do it, but I decided on Fatties instead :) . I love 'em. I guess you could use FDs, but don't get a 24 fret neck with them if you slap much- you wouldn't have room. Mark
13 years ago
·
#11043
0
Votes
Undo
Calling Jjango! Could we please get a Z3 with FD-3s instead of super fatties? So that we can see how much space would three FD-3s leave. Thanks!
13 years ago
·
#10983
0
Votes
Undo
I think most of the posters here have already seen this, but in the off chance that they haven't, here's a detailed thread at TB with more pictures and details of my Z build... http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=461332 :D
13 years ago
·
#10904
0
Votes
Undo
[quote="guitarded":2cxsau9t]As far as the Z3 having a weaker B string tone, I haven't noticed it, but I haven't A-B'ed my basses. Could it be the more present mids of the Fatties makes it seem like D.lord is hearing less B string from a Z3 ? I can't imagine that would slip by Sheldon, or that that would have been his goal w/ the Fatties.[/quote:2cxsau9t] Don't get confused, that's not what I said by any means! The low B is as strong and full as in any Dingwall, it's just not as clear-as-a-bell as with FD-3s. Just a different flavour really. It's just that the FD-3 is such a fantastic pickup that, [i:2cxsau9t]for my taste[/i:2cxsau9t], super fatties somewhat don't do justice to a Z. Still, if someone finds FD-3s too hi-fi, I can see how they could prefer super fatties. You just gotta keep on your mind that, AFAIK, the fatties were developed for the super j 5, so if that's the sound you like choose them, otherwise if you like the dingwall sound as we know it from ABs, Zs and Primas then FD-3 it is. I don't see the super fatties as an improved FD-3 (and I guess nor does Sheldon, otherwise they'd be called FD-4) but as a pickup going to a somewhat different direction tonally.
13 years ago
·
#10902
0
Votes
Undo
The great thing about Dingwall is that they are made by Sheldon!!! oops, wrong speech!!! :wink: (still ti's true) Ok, I've found the proper speech :P Another great thing is that the "dipped glass" finish, as well as oil finishes on Dingwall basses, don't show the fingerprints and smudges. I wipe my strings and neck every time I play, but the body does not get that kind of treatment every time (maybe every second or third time :oops: )
13 years ago
·
#10899
0
Votes
Undo
Maybe slightly off-topic, but are the finishes on Z basses quite shiny and do they show smudges and fingerprints easily? I had a *cough* Spector bass for a few weeks and the worst thing about it was how many marks it showed, regardless of how careful you were with it. Much prefer satin finishes and sometimes, natural oil finishes. Cheers, EG
13 years ago
·
#10894
0
Votes
Undo
[quote="guitarded":3huk3o5v] As far as the Z3 having a weaker B string tone, I haven't noticed it, but I haven't A-B'ed my basses. Could it be the more present mids of the Fatties makes it seem like D.lord is hearing less B string from a Z3 ? I can't imagine that would slip by Sheldon, or that that would have been his goal w/ the Fatties. Mark[/quote:3huk3o5v] It's not a matter of a weaker (or lesser) B string with the Super Fatties. The B is big, the mids are more singing and pronounced but the snap and clarity of the B string is not as great as with the FDs (FD3's and PAs) The Super Fatties come from the Super J front and while retaining many tonal nuances of the FD's, they are a different animal (esp regarding the B string)
13 years ago
·
#10893
0
Votes
Undo
[quote="FrankM":7dipzs5r]Mark-- I have FD1s in my ABI. I don't think - at least it hasn't -farted or burped for me. The pickups are super punchy, tons of mids, aggressive sounding. Not like any fender Jazz bass I've ever played. Now my rear p'up on my SJ has a lot of bark in it, but i believe its a one off from Sheldon[/quote:7dipzs5r] Well, IMO, that's how all of my Jazz basses have sounded with the bridge soloed, how you described the FD1s, so... I'm sure plucking attack has more that a bit to do with it also. My SJ also will bark pretty nicely with the bridge soloed. As far as the Z3 having a weaker B string tone, I haven't noticed it, but I haven't A-B'ed my basses. Could it be the more present mids of the Fatties makes it seem like D.lord is hearing less B string from a Z3 ? I can't imagine that would slip by Sheldon, or that that would have been his goal w/ the Fatties. Mark Mark
13 years ago
·
#10892
0
Votes
Undo
[quote="Dragonlord":31ki0n82] By A/Bing a Z3 to Zs and Primas with FD-3. I found the low B definition a bit lacking. Still, I know it can work for a lot of people - for example, I don't like bartolini pickups and they are among the most popular out there, so your mileage may definitely vary. I still think that super fatties will appeal more to the more traditional crowd.[/quote:31ki0n82] That's interesting as one of Sheldon's goals with the Super Fattie is better definiton of the low B. Mark, others with a Z3, any definition differences that you notice on the B between the different pups?
13 years ago
·
#10891
0
Votes
Undo
[quote="John H.":1lgj4rgk]Hi Dragonlord, Where did you get the impression that the Super Fatties have less definition and harmonic content than the FD-3s? When I played the FD-3s and Fatties side by side (my ABII and twoport's Z3), I didn't get that impression. They were different in subtle ways, but I don't think one was less than the other. Let me know your experience. Thanks, John[/quote:1lgj4rgk] By A/Bing a Z3 to Zs and Primas with FD-3. I found the low B definition a bit lacking. Still, I know it can work for a lot of people - for example, I don't like bartolini pickups and they are among the most popular out there, so your mileage may definitely vary. I still think that super fatties will appeal more to the more traditional crowd.
There are no replies made for this post yet.
Be one of the first to reply to this post!